am, July 13th, 2017 - 128 comments Categories: act, class war, families, human rights, national - Tags: act, breeding for a business, David Seymour, eugenics, nanny state, poor, reproductive rights OK then. That probably sounds very familiar, and so it should, because the Nats have said similar things over the years.The dearly departed John Key “thought” (despite all the evidence to the contrary) that parents on the DPB were “breeding for a business”.The above formulas assume Excel is using the 1900 date system.
Review current and previous years’ IRS agent reports for income tax settlements. Review the minutes of BOD and stockholders’ meetings4.These are the kinds of attitudes that we need to vote out of office in September.Seymour gets a 9K salary thanks to a Nat handout.For additional information on the Excel Date Systems, see MS KB article titled XL: The 1900 Date System vs. The 1900 Date system has other well-known quarks, too.For the background of this dual system in the context of a developer's rather funny/scary encounter with Bill Gates, read this blog entry by Joel Spolsky.